Yup, I was a Cleve Blakemore convert from the moment I hit Koanic’s website. You should have seen my reaction to this post.
Anyway, it’s nice to see that the fear of slave revolts is hard-coded in the DNA of these faux-genius sociopaths. If you know what a person values and what he fears you can predict ~90% of his actions.
The term “elite panic” was coined by Caron Chess and Lee Clarke of Rutgers. From the beginning of the field in the 1950s to the present, the major sociologists of disaster — Charles Fritz, Enrico Quarantelli, Kathleen Tierney, and Lee Clarke — proceeding in the most cautious, methodical, and clearly attempting-to-be-politically-neutral way of social scientists, arrived via their research at this enormous confidence in human nature and deep critique of institutional authority. It’s quite remarkable.
Elites tend to believe in a venal, selfish, and essentially monstrous version of human nature, which I sometimes think is their own human nature. I mean, people don’t become incredibly wealthy and powerful by being angelic, necessarily. They believe that only their power keeps the rest of us in line and that when it somehow shrinks away, our seething violence will rise to the surface — that was very clear in Katrina. Timothy Garton Ash and Maureen Dowd and all these other people immediately jumped on the bandwagon and started writing commentaries based on the assumption that the rumors of mass violence during Katrina were true. A lot of people have never understood that the rumors were dispelled and that those things didn’t actually happen; it’s tragic.
But there’s also an elite fear — going back to the 19th century — that there will be urban insurrection. It’s a valid fear. I see these moments of crisis as moments of popular power and positive social change. The major example in my book is Mexico City, where the ’85 earthquake prompted public disaffection with the one-party system and, therefore, the rebirth of civil society.
(Interview by Astra Taylor)
Her thesis is, naturally, an overcorrection to the Hobbesian perspective on human nature (recall the recent hubbub over women’s right to get in the lifeboats first(. But her essential conclusion of “solidarity, not charity” is definitely on the right track.
(Admin note: Text needs to be a bit brighter.)